Emmanuel Ekpor

Prevalence and predictors of traditional medicine use among persons with diabetes in africa: a systematic review

• Authors Details :  
• Emmanuel Ekpor,  
• Eric Osei,  
• Samuel Akyirem

Journal title : International Health

Publisher : Oxford University Press (OUP)

Online ISSN : 1876-3405

178 Views Reviews Article

The utilization of traditional medicine (TM) is prevalent among the general population in Africa; however, its use among individuals with diabetes in the region remains underdocumented. This review aimed to synthesize the available literature to identify the prevalence and predictors of TM use among persons with diabetes in Africa. A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and AMED, covering studies published from 2000 to April 2023. Of 1560 records identified, 24 articles met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of TM use varied significantly, ranging from 12.4% to 77.1%, with a median prevalence of 50%. TM was commonly used concurrently with conventional medicine (CM) (35.4–88.4%), with a majority (63.8–91.3%) not disclosing TM use to healthcare providers. Female gender, long diabetes duration, use of oral antiglycaemic medication and family history of diabetes emerged as the most common factors that predicted the use of TM. This review highlights the widespread use of TM among individuals with diabetes in Africa, often in conjunction with CM. The high prevalence of undisclosed TM use emphasizes the urgent need for healthcare providers to actively inquire about TM use during clinical consultations to address potential herb–drug interactions and adverse effects.

Article DOI & Crossmark Data

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihad080

Article Subject Details

• Alternative medicine
• Diagnosis and treatment
• Health promotion
• Medicine

Article Keywords Details

• Africa
• Alternative medicine
• Diabetes
• Systematic review
• Traditional medicine

Article File

Full Text PDF

---

---

Article References

• (1). 10.1080/07853890.2023.2182909
• (2). 10.1136/hrt.2008.147306
• (3). 10.1186/1471-2458-11-564
• (4). 10.2337/dc23-S009
• (5). 10.1007/s00228-021-03097-x
• (6). 10.1155/2013/617459
• (7). 10.1097/01.EPX.0000440994.89503.45
• (8). 10.3389/fphar.2016.00248
• (9). 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000895
• (10). 10.1016/S1262-3636(07)70265-3
• (11). 10.1016/j.ajme.2013.01.006
• (12). 10.9734/ARRB/2014/8015
• (13). 10.4236/ojcd.2014.43024
• (14). 10.5897/JPP2014.0338
• (15). 10.1186/s12906-016-1262-2
• (16). 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.11.005
• (17). 10.26719/2017.23.5.375
• (18). 10.5897/JPP2016.0437
• (19). 10.1007/s11096-018-0648-2
• (20). 10.1186/s12906-018-2147-3
• (21). 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01421
• (22). 10.1155/2020/4871459
• (23). 10.1016/j.jep.2021.113984
• (24). 10.1016/j.hermed.2021.100480
• (25). 10.1016/j.metop.2021.100120
• (26). 10.1007/s10943-021-01187-9
• (27). 10.55779/nsb14411322
• (28). 10.1155/2022/7334080
• (29). 10.11604/pamj.2022.42.319.32572
• (30). 10.1038/pcan.2010.38
• (31). 10.1016/j.hermed.2021.100476
• (32). 10.1186/1472-6882-10-35
• (33). 10.1016/S2095-4964(15)60196-0
• (34). 10.1016/j.imr.2014.05.001
• (35). 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0223

---

More Article by Emmanuel Ekpor