Ajoy Nundoochan

Impact of out of pocket payments on financial risk protection indicators in a setting with no user fees: the case of mauritius

• Authors Details :  
• Ajoy Nundoochan,  
• Yusuf Thorabally,  
• Sooneeraz Monohur,  
• Justine Hsu

Journal title : International Journal for Equity in Health

Publisher : Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Online ISSN : 1475-9276

Journal volume : 18

Journal issue : 1

1K Views Research reports

Background Mauritius embraces principles of a welfare state with free health care at point of use in any public facilities. However, the health financing landscape changed in 2007 when Private Health Expenditure (PvtHE) surpassed General Government Health Expenditure. PvtHE is predominately out of pocket (OOP) with only 3.4% related to premiums for private insurance. In 2014, Household OOP Expenditure on health accounted for 52.8% of total health expenditure. OOP is known to be regressive and to impact negatively on households’ living standards. Objectives This paper aims to examine trends in OOP in Mauritius, to assess its impacts through an analysis of key indicators of financial protection, namely catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and impoverishment due to OOP health expenditure. It also aims to predict core determinants of CHEs. Methods Household Budget Surveys (HBS) of 2001/2002, 2006/2007 and 2012 were the primary source data. CHE and impoverishment were used to assess financial hardships resulting from OOP health payments. The incidence of CHE was estimated at three threshold levels (10,25 and 40%), using the budget share and the capacity to pay approaches. Impoverishment due to OOP was measured by changes in the incidence of poverty and intensity of poverty using the US$ 3.1 international poverty line. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify determinants of CHE. Findings Household CHE increased from 5.78% in 2001/02 to 8.85% in 2012 and 0.61% in 2001/02 to 1.25% in 2012, for 10 and 40% thresholds, respectively. The incidence of CHE was significantly higher in urban areas compared to rural areas. The highest levels of CHEs were among households’ heads, who are retired rising from 1.62% in 2001/02 to 3.71% in 2012, followed by households’ head who are widowed from 2.29% in 2001/02 to 2.63% in 2012 and homemakers from 2.12% in 2001/02 to 2.57% in 2012 at the 40% threshold. The share of households pushed below the poverty line due to OOP dropped from 0.4% in 2001/02 to 0.2% in 2006/07 before rising to 0.34% in 2012. In 2012, poverty gap occurred only among households under poorest quintile 1 (0.24%) and quintile 2 (0.03%). Overall poverty gap dropped from 0.08% in 2001/02 to 0.05% in 2012. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the odds ratio of facing CHE were significant only among households with heads being retired and with a presence of an elderly member in the household. Conclusion Despite the rise in incidence of CHE between 2001 and 2012 the impact of OOP on the level of impoverishment and poverty gap has not been significant.

Article DOI & Crossmark Data

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-0959-5

Article Subject Details

• Health economics

Article File

Full Text PDF

Article References

• (1). UN General Assembly. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations; 2015.
• (2). World Health Organization and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / the World Bank: tracking universal health coverage: 2017 global monitoring report. Available at https://www.who.int/healthinfo/universal_health_coverage/report/2017/en/ . Accessed 25 Mar 2019.
• (3). World Health Organization, World Bank Group. Monitoring progress towards universal health coverage at country and global levels, Framework measures and targets. Geneva: World Health Organization and International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, World Bank; 2014. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/112824/WHO_HIS_HIA_14.1_eng.pdf?sequence=1 . Accessed on 25 Mar 2019
• (4). Islam MR, Rahman MS, Islam Z, et al. Inequalities in financial risk protection in Bangladesh: an assessment of universal health coverage. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):59.
• (5). Saksena P, Hsu J, Evans DB. Financial risk protection and universal health coverage evidence and measurement challenges. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9):e1001701.
• (6). Wagstaff A. Measuring financial protection in health. World Bank policy research working paper no. 4554. Washington DC: World Bank; 2008. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/157391468140940134/Measuring-financial-protection-in-health
• (7). Murray CJL, Evans DB. Health systems performance assessments: debates, methods and empiricism. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2003/9241562455.pdf . Accessed on 25 Mar 2019
• (8). WHO. The World Health Report 1999. Making a difference. Geneva: World Health Organization. 1999.
• (9). WHO. The World Health Report 2010: Health systems financing: the path to universal coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
• (10). WHO. World Health Report 2000. Health systems: improving performance. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000.
• (11). Verguet S, Olson ZD, Babigumira JB, Desalegn D, Johansson KA, Kruk ME, et al. Health gains and financial risk protection afforded by public financing of selected interventions in Ethiopia an extended cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 2015;3:288–96.
• (12). The World Bank, IBRD, IDA. Available at https//data.worldbank.org/country/mauritius . Accessed on 25 Mar 2019.
• (13). Ministry of Health & Quality of Life, Republic of Mauritius. Family Planning & Demographic Yearbook 2016. Available at http://health.govmu.org/English/Documents/2017/5th%20Dec17Final%20Family%20Planning%20and%20Demographic%20Yearbook%20(1)%20(1).pdf . Accessed on 25 Mar 2019.
• (14). Ministry of Finance and Economic Development, Statistics Mauritius, Republic of Mauritius. Poverty Analysis 2012. Available at http://statsmauritius.govmu.org/English/StatsbySubj/Documents/Poverty/Poverty%20Analysis%202012.pdf . Accessed on 25 Mar 2019.
• (15). Ministry of Health & Quality of Life, Republic of Mauritius. Survey Report 2015 Household out of pocket Expenditure on health. Available at http://health.govmu.org/English/Documents/2015%20Survey%20Report%20on%20Household%20Out-of-Pocket%20Expenditure%20on%20Health.pdf . Accessed on 25 Mar 2019.
• (16). Ministry of Health & Quality of Life, Republic of Mauritius. National Health Accounts 2015. Available at http://health.govmu.org/English//DOCUMENTS/FINAL%20NHA%20REPORT%202015%2019.06.2017.PDF . Accessed on 25 Mar 2018.
• (17). World health statistics 2016: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available at http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/en/ . Accessed on 25 Mar 2019.
• (18). Ministry of Health & Quality of Life, Republic of Mauritius. World Health Survey Report. 2003. Available at http://health.govmu.org/English/Statistics/Pages/World-Health-Survey-Report-for-Mauritius-2003.aspx . Accessed on 25 Mar 2019.
• (19). Ministry of Finance and Economic Development, Statistics Mauritius, Republic of Mauritius. Household Budget Survey Main Results & Updated weights for the Consumer Price Index. Available at http://statsmauritius.govmu.org/English/StatsbySubj/Pages/HouseholdBudget.aspx . Accessed on 25 Mar 2019.
• (20). Musgrove P, Zeramdini R, Carrin G. Basic patterns in national health expenditure. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80:134–42.
• (21). Xu K, Evans DB, Kawabata K, Zeramdini R, Klavus J, Murray CJ. Household catastrophic health expenditure: a multicountry analysis. Lancet. 2003;362:111–7.
• (22). Khan J, Ahmed S, Evans T. Catastrophic healthcare Expenditure and poverty related to out-of-pocket payments for healthcare in Bangladesh - an estimation of financial risk protection of universal health coverage. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32(8):1102–10.
• (23). Ahmed S, Szabo S, Nilsen K. Catastrophic healthcare expenditure and impoverishment in tropical deltas: evidence from the Mekong Delta region. Int J Equity Health. 2018 Apr;17(1):53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0757-5 .
• (24). Chuma J, Maina T : Catastrophic health care spending and impoverishment in Kenya. BMC Health Serv Res 2012 12:413. Available at https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-413 . Accessed on 25 Mar 2019.
• (25). O’Donnell O, van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Lindelow M. Analyzing health equity using household survey data: a guide to techniques and their implementation. Washington, D.C: World Bank Publications; 2008.
• (26). Xu K. Expenditure and Resource Allocation: Distribution of health payments and catastrophic expenditures Methodology. Health System Financing Department. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/69030/1/EIP_HSF_DP_05.2.pdf . Accessed on 25 Mar 2019
• (27). Xu K, Evans DB, Kadama P, Nabyonga J, Ogwal PO, Nabukhonzo P, et al. Understanding the impact of eliminating user fees: utilization and catastrophic health expenditures in Uganda. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:866–87.
• (28). McIntyre D, Doherty J and Ataguba J. Universal Health Coverage Assessment, South Africa Global Network for Health Equity (GNHE). Available on http://funsalud.org.mx/gnhe/Documentos/UHCDay/GNHE%20UHC%20assessment_South%20Africa.pdf . Accessed on 25 Mar 2019.
• (29). Wagstaff A, Flores G, Smitz M-F, Hsu J, Chepynoga K, Eozenou P. Progress on impoverishing health spending: results for 122 countries. A retrospective observational study. Lancet Glob Health 2018;6(2):e180-e192. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29248366 . Accessed on 25 Mar 2019.
• (30). Ministry of Health & Quality of Life, Republic of Mauritius. Non Communicable Diseases Survey. Available at http://health.govmu.org/English/Statistics/Pages/NCD-Survey-Reports.aspx . Accessed on 25 Mar 2019.
• (31). Tripathi S, Bhattacharya S. Patient perception about generic vs. branded medicines prescribed in a tertiary Care Hospital in Northern India -a descriptive study. Indian J Pharm Pract. 2018;11(2):91–5 Available at http://www.ijopp.org/article/603 . Accessed on 25 Mar 2019.
• (32). Nardi EP, Ferraz MB, Pinheiro GRC, Kowalski SC, Sato EI. Perceptions of the population regarding generic drugs in Brazil: a nationwide survey. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:117 Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4334599/ . Accessed on 25 Mar 2019.
• (33). Ministry of Health & Quality of Life and WHO: Medicine Prices, Availability, Affordability and Price Components in the Republic of Mauritius. Available at http://mih.govmu.org/English/Research/Documents/Research/Report.pdf . Accessed on 25 Mar 2019.
• (34). Ministry of Health & Quality of Life, Republic of Mauritius, European Union and WHO: National assessment of health systems - Challenges and Opportunities for better Non-communicable diseases outcomes in Mauritius. 2018.

---

More Article by Ajoy Nundoochan