Saran Malisorn
A retrospective cohort study of decompressive techniques for cubital tunnel syndrome: in situ decompression versus ulnar nerve transposition
Journal title : Cureus
Publisher : Cureus, Inc.
Print ISSN : 2168-8184
9 Views Original Article
Background: Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is the second most common nerve entrapment syndrome of the upper extremity after carpal tunnel syndrome. In situ decompression (ISD) and ulnar nerve transposition (UNT) are the major surgery methods in practice for the treatment of CuTS. However, controversies exist over the efficacy and safety of these methods. Aim: The objective of the study was to compare the short- and long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with ISD and UNT surgery. Method: This was a retrospective study comprising 56 patients who underwent either ISD or UNT at Naresuan University Hospital between January 2013 and December 2022. Data on age, sex, hand involved, duration of the surgery, duration of the symptoms including the clinical outcomes such as elbow range of motion (ROM), quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH), McGowan grade (MGG), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain scores, motor and sensory conduction velocity (MCV1, MCV2, and SCV), and Tinel's sign were collected during the two-week, one-month, three-month, and six-month follow-ups post-surgery. Results: Of the 56 patients in the study, 62.5% were female. The number of patients aged <60 years was higher in both groups. The mean age of patients in the ISD group was 49.07±6.13 years, while in the UNT group, it was 51.5±7.04 years. After one month, 53.57% and 32.14% of the patients recovered to MGG 1 in the ISD and UNT groups, respectively. The majority of the patients had MGG 1 six months after the surgery. The QuickDASH score and pain scores of the patients improved during all follow-ups, but no statistical significance was revealed when the two techniques were compared. Conclusion: The study found that both the ISD and UNT were efficient and safe in treating CuTS. Further study with the inclusion of parameters such as revision surgery and complications would be vital.
Article DOI & Crossmark Data
DOI : https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.74953
Article Subject Details
Article Keywords Details
Article File
Full Text PDFArticle References
- (1). An TW, Evanoff BA, Boyer MI, Osei DA. The prevalence of cubital tunnel syndrome: a cross-sectional study in a U.S. metropolitan cohort. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017, 99:408-16. 10.2106/JBJS.15.01162
- (2). Kákosy T. Tunnel syndromes of the upper extremities in workers using hand-operated vibrating tools. Med Lav. 1994, 85:474-80.
- (3). Cutts S. Cubital tunnel syndrome. Postgrad Med J. 2007, 83:28-31. 10.1136/pgmj.2006.047456
- (4). Elhassan B, Steinmann SP. Entrapment neuropathy of the ulnar nerve. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007, 15:672-81. 10.5435/00124635-200711000-00006
- (5). Drake ML, Hensley DT, Chen WC, Taylor KF. Muscle atrophy at presentation of cubital tunnel syndrome: demographics and duration of symptoms. Hand (N Y). 2017, 12:64-7. 10.1177/1558944716643096
- (6). Graf A, Ahmed AS, Roundy R, Gottschalk MB, Dempsey A. Modern treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: evidence and controversy. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023, 5:547-60. 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.07.008
- (7). Kessler RB, Thompson RG, Lourie GM. Cubital tunnel syndrome: a surgical modification to in situ decompression to improve results. JSES Int. 2020, 4:15-20. 10.1016/j.jseint.2019.11.004
- (8). Boone S, Gelberman RH, Calfee RP. The management of cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2015, 40:1897-904; quiz 1904. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.03.011
- (9). Eberlin KR, Marjoua Y, Jupiter JB. Compressive neuropathy of the ulnar nerve: a perspective on history and current controversies. J Hand Surg Am. 2017, 42:464-9. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.027
- (10). Sousa M, Aido R, Trigueiros M, Lemos R, Silva C. Cubital compressive neuropathy in the elbow: in situ neurolysis versus anterior transposition - comparative study. Rev Bras Ortop. 2014, 49:647-52. 10.1016/j.rboe.2014.10.005
- (11). Said RA, Rashed ME, Salama HH, Fattah IM. Ulnar nerve entrapment in cubital tunnel: transposition versus decompression alone. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2021, 8:4065-77.
- (12). Osei DA, Groves AP, Bommarito K, Ray WZ. Cubital tunnel syndrome: incidence and demographics in a national administrative database. Neurosurgery. 2017, 80:417-20. 10.1093/neuros/nyw061
- (13). Abouzeid W, Almamoun M, Niazy T, Abbas M, Abdeltawab M. Ulnar nerve in situ decompression versus transposition for idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome: long-term clinical outcome: multicenteric retrospective study. Pan Arab J Neurosurg. 2022, 17:71-9. 10.21608/PAJN.2022.106067.1039
- (14). Malisorn S. Treatment of the cubital tunnel syndrome of the ulnar nerve in the elbow area: a review article. J Clin Diagn Res. 2023, 17:RE01-6. 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62656.18243
- (15). Novak CB, Mackinnon SE. Selection of operative procedures for cubital tunnel syndrome. Hand (N Y). 2009, 4:50-4. 10.1007/s11552-008-9133-z
- (16). Wade RG, Griffiths TT, Flather R, Burr NE, Teo M, Bourke G. Safety and outcomes of different surgical techniques for cubital tunnel decompression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020, 3:e2024352. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24352
More Article by Saran malisorn
Carpal tunnel syndrome (cts) is caused by the shortening of the median nerves in the wrist, resulting in hand pain and paralysis necessitating surgical operation for relief. conven...
Lateral epicondylitis, commonly known as tennis elbow, affects approximately 1-3% of the population. despite the absence of histological evidence of inflammation in the affected ti...
Background: while osteoporosis increases the risk of fragility fractures, bisphosphonate has been proven to increase bone strengthand reduce the risk of vertebral and non-vertebral...